FreeTextSearch
 
search View English language version of this page
 
 
 

The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 showed consistent factor structure across six working samples [Epub ahead of print]

Reference Abma FI, Bültmann U, Amick III BC, et al. The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 showed consistent factor structure across six working samples [Epub ahead of print]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2017;
Udgivet: 2017
[Type] Videnskabelig artikel
[Resumé] [Open access]Objective The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 (WRFQ) is an outcome measure linking a persons' health to the ability to meet work demands in the twenty-first century. We aimed to examine the construct validity of the WRFQ in a heterogeneous set of working samples in the Netherlands with mixed clinical conditions and job types to evaluate the comparability of the scale structure. Methods Confirmatory factor and multi-group analyses were conducted in six cross-sectional working samples (total N = 2433) to evaluate and compare a five-factor model structure of the WRFQ (work scheduling demands, output demands, physical demands, mental and social demands, and flexibility demands). Model fit indices were calculated based on RMSEA /= 0.95. After fitting the five-factor model, the multidimensional structure of the instrument was evaluated across samples using a second order factor model. Results The factor structure was robust across samples and a multi-group model had adequate fit (RMSEA = 0.63, CFI = 0.972). In sample specific analyses, minor modifications were necessary in three samples (final RMSEA 0.055-0.080, final CFI between 0.955 and 0.989). Applying the previous first order specifications, a second order factor model had adequate fit in all samples. Conclusion A five-factor model of the WRFQ showed consistent structural validity across samples. A second order factor model showed adequate fit, but the second order factor loadings varied across samples. Therefore subscale scores are recommended to compare across different clinical and working samples
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9722-1
Bestilling: Denne udgivelse kan ikke bestilles fra NFA's Forlag
[Oprettet] 19.09.2017
 
Opdateret  19.09.2017
Kontakt: NFA's webredaktion
 
Sociale medieomtaler af denne artikel

Klik på cirklen for mere information om omtaler og deling af denne artikel.

Altmetric er en tjeneste, der registrerer sociale medieomtaler og delinger af referencer forskningsartikler, hvis læsere har linket unikt til artiklen (tidskriftets abstractside, DOI-link etc.). Tjenesten overvåger p.t. omtaler på udvalgte sociale medieplatforme.

Hvis cirklen viser "?", er der endnu ikke registreret omtaler på de overvågede medier.

Om betalingstidsskrifter
Mange videnskabelige tidsskrifter tager betaling for adgang til hele artiklen. Hvis du ikke har adgang til et bestemt tidsskrift, kan du benytte Bibliotek.dk. Her kan du søge efter artikler, bogtitler og tidsskrifter på tværs af de danske bibliotekssystemer.

Det letteste er at gå ind under "Flere søgemuligheder" på siden og så indtaste tidsskriftets navn i Feltet "Titel". Derved får du en oversigt over folke- eller forskningsbiblioteker, som abonnerer på det pågældende tidsskrift.

 
 
 

Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø | Lersø Parkallé 105 | DK-2100 København Ø |

Tlf 39 16 52 00 | fax 39 16 52 01 | e-mail: nfa@arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk | CVR: 15413700 | EAN: 5798000399518

Vis desktop version
|WEBSITET ANVENDER COOKIES TIL AT HUSKE DIG OG DINE INDSTILLINGER.| Læs mere her