FreeTextSearch
 
search View English language version of this page
 
 
 

Long-term effectiveness of a stress management intervention at work: A 9-year follow-up study based on a randomized wait-list controlled trial in male managers

Reference Li J, Riedel N, Barrech A, et al. Long-term effectiveness of a stress management intervention at work: A 9-year follow-up study based on a randomized wait-list controlled trial in male managers. Biomed Research International 2017;2017:2853813
Udgivet: 2017
[Type] Videnskabelig artikel
[Resumé] [Open access]Objective. Short-andmedium-termeffectiveness (up to 3 years) of individual level stressmanagement interventions (SMI) at work were demonstrated, yet long-term effectiveness remains unexplored. We therefore aimed to address this research gap. Methods. 94 male middle managers participated in a randomized wait-list controlled trial between 2006 and 2008 and in a post-trial-followup survey in 2015. During the first two years, all received an 18-hour psychotherapeutic SMI intervention which was based on the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model: tackling stressor on mismatch between effort and reward and promoting recovery on overcommitment. Work stress (i.e., ERI indicators) was the primary outcome, and the secondary outcome was depressive symptoms. The long-term effectiveness of the SMI was examined by mixed modeling, using an external control group (p = 94). Results. Effort and reward were substantially improved with significant intervention * time interaction effects (p < 0.001) compared to the external control group; effects on overcommitment and depressive symptoms were also significant (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, resp.), though their trajectories in the intervention group were less sustainable. Conclusions. The effectiveness of this psychotherapeutic SMI at work based on the ERI model was observed over a 9-year period, particularly on the effort-reward ratio
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2853813
Bestilling: Denne udgivelse kan ikke bestilles fra NFA's Forlag
[Oprettet] 02.11.2017
 
Opdateret  02.11.2017
Kontakt: NFA's webredaktion
 
Sociale medieomtaler af denne artikel

Klik på cirklen for mere information om omtaler og deling af denne artikel.

Altmetric er en tjeneste, der registrerer sociale medieomtaler og delinger af referencer forskningsartikler, hvis læsere har linket unikt til artiklen (tidskriftets abstractside, DOI-link etc.). Tjenesten overvåger p.t. omtaler på udvalgte sociale medieplatforme.

Hvis cirklen viser "?", er der endnu ikke registreret omtaler på de overvågede medier.

Om betalingstidsskrifter
Mange videnskabelige tidsskrifter tager betaling for adgang til hele artiklen. Hvis du ikke har adgang til et bestemt tidsskrift, kan du benytte Bibliotek.dk. Her kan du søge efter artikler, bogtitler og tidsskrifter på tværs af de danske bibliotekssystemer.

Det letteste er at gå ind under "Flere søgemuligheder" på siden og så indtaste tidsskriftets navn i Feltet "Titel". Derved får du en oversigt over folke- eller forskningsbiblioteker, som abonnerer på det pågældende tidsskrift.

 
 
 

Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø | Lersø Parkallé 105 | DK-2100 København Ø |

Tlf 39 16 52 00 | fax 39 16 52 01 | e-mail: nfa@arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk | CVR: 15413700 | EAN: 5798000399518

Vis desktop version
|WEBSITET ANVENDER COOKIES TIL AT HUSKE DIG OG DINE INDSTILLINGER.| Læs mere her