FreeTextSearch
 
search View English language version of this page
 
 
 

Can beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work be changed at the national level? Prospective evaluation of the Danish national Job & Body campaign

Reference Andersen LL, Geisle N, Knudsen B. Can beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work be changed at the national level? Prospective evaluation of the Danish national Job & Body campaign. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health 2018;44(1):25-36.
Udgivet: 2018
[Type] Videnskabelig artikel
[Resumé] [Open access]Objectives This study evaluates the Danish national Job & Body campaign on beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work. Methods Initiated in 2011, a national campaign in Denmark targeted public sector employees with a mixture of networking activities, workplace visits, and a mass media outreach with topics related to job and body (eg, musculoskeletal pain, movement and work) and creating balance between demands at work and physical capacity. At baseline (2011) and at four time points until the end of 2014, random cross-sectional samples of >/=>/=1000 representative public sector employees (total N=5012) replied to eight questions concerning beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work. Changes over time were modelled using general linear models (averaged for all questions, 0-100 points, where 0 is completely negative and 100 completely positive) and logistic regression analyses (for the single questions) controlling for age, gender and a number of work-related factors. Results At the last follow-up in 2014, 17.3% of public sector employees were familiar with the campaign. Beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work were 3.4 points (95% CI 2.4-4.3) higher than at baseline. For the single questions, 4 out of 8 showed improved odds for more positive beliefs [odds ratios (OR) of 1.28-1.89]. Conclusion During follow-up of the national campaign, beliefs about musculoskeletal pain and work were more positive among public sector employees in Denmark. Due to the time-wise mixture of several campaign activities, the isolated effect of each component could not be disentangled. Whether changes in health occurred remain unknown
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3692
Bestilling: Denne udgivelse kan ikke bestilles fra NFA's Forlag
[Oprettet] 28.11.2017
 
Opdateret  28.11.2017
Kontakt: NFA's webredaktion
 
Sociale medieomtaler af denne artikel

Klik på cirklen for mere information om omtaler og deling af denne artikel.

Altmetric er en tjeneste, der registrerer sociale medieomtaler og delinger af referencer forskningsartikler, hvis læsere har linket unikt til artiklen (tidskriftets abstractside, DOI-link etc.). Tjenesten overvåger p.t. omtaler på udvalgte sociale medieplatforme.

Hvis cirklen viser "?", er der endnu ikke registreret omtaler på de overvågede medier.

Om betalingstidsskrifter
Mange videnskabelige tidsskrifter tager betaling for adgang til hele artiklen. Hvis du ikke har adgang til et bestemt tidsskrift, kan du benytte Bibliotek.dk. Her kan du søge efter artikler, bogtitler og tidsskrifter på tværs af de danske bibliotekssystemer.

Det letteste er at gå ind under "Flere søgemuligheder" på siden og så indtaste tidsskriftets navn i Feltet "Titel". Derved får du en oversigt over folke- eller forskningsbiblioteker, som abonnerer på det pågældende tidsskrift.

 
 
 

Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø | Lersø Parkallé 105 | DK-2100 København Ø |

Tlf 39 16 52 00 | fax 39 16 52 01 | e-mail: nfa@arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk | CVR: 15413700 | EAN: 5798000399518

Vis desktop version
|WEBSITET ANVENDER COOKIES TIL AT HUSKE DIG OG DINE INDSTILLINGER.| Læs mere her