FreeTextSearch
 
search View English language version of this page
 
 
 

Persistent social inequality in low intake of vegetables among adolescents, 2002-2014 [Epub ahead of print]

Reference Rasmussen M, Pedersen TP, Johnsen NF, et al. Persistent social inequality in low intake of vegetables among adolescents, 2002-2014 [Epub ahead of print]. Public Health Nutrition 2018;
Udgivet: 2018
[Type] Videnskabelig artikel
[Resumé] OBJECTIVE: To examine the trend in social inequality in low intake of vegetables among adolescents in Denmark from 2002 to 2014 using occupational social class (OSC) as socio-economic indicator. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional school surveys including four waves of data collection in 2002-2014. The analyses focused on absolute social inequality (difference between high and low OSC in low vegetable intake) as well as relative social inequality (OR for low vegetable intake by OSC). SETTING: The nationally representative Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in Denmark. SUBJECTS: The study population was 11-15-year olds (n 17 243). RESULTS: Low intake of vegetables was defined as less than weekly intake measured by food frequency items. OSC was measured by student reports of parents' occupation. The proportion of participants who reported eating vegetables less than once weekly was 8.9 %, with a notable decrease from 11.9 % in 2002 to 5.9 % in 2014. The OR (95 % CI) for less than weekly vegetable intake was 2.28 (1.98, 2.63) in the middle compared with high OSC and 3.12 (2.67, 3.66) in the low compared with high OSC. The absolute social inequality in low vegetable intake decreased from 2002 to 2014 but the relative social inequality remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores that it is important to address socio-economic factors in future efforts to promote vegetable intake among adolescents. The statistical analyses of social inequality in vegetable intake demonstrate that it is important to address both absolute and relative social inequality as these two phenomena may develop differently
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136898001800040X
Bestilling: Denne udgivelse kan ikke bestilles fra NFA's Forlag
[Oprettet] 22.03.2018
 
Opdateret  22.03.2018
Kontakt: NFA's webredaktion
 
Sociale medieomtaler af denne artikel

Klik på cirklen for mere information om omtaler og deling af denne artikel.

Altmetric er en tjeneste, der registrerer sociale medieomtaler og delinger af referencer forskningsartikler, hvis læsere har linket unikt til artiklen (tidskriftets abstractside, DOI-link etc.). Tjenesten overvåger p.t. omtaler på udvalgte sociale medieplatforme.

Hvis cirklen viser "?", er der endnu ikke registreret omtaler på de overvågede medier.

Om betalingstidsskrifter
Mange videnskabelige tidsskrifter tager betaling for adgang til hele artiklen. Hvis du ikke har adgang til et bestemt tidsskrift, kan du benytte Bibliotek.dk. Her kan du søge efter artikler, bogtitler og tidsskrifter på tværs af de danske bibliotekssystemer.

Det letteste er at gå ind under "Flere søgemuligheder" på siden og så indtaste tidsskriftets navn i Feltet "Titel". Derved får du en oversigt over folke- eller forskningsbiblioteker, som abonnerer på det pågældende tidsskrift.

 
 
 

Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø | Lersø Parkallé 105 | DK-2100 København Ø |

Tlf 39 16 52 00 | fax 39 16 52 01 | e-mail: nfa@arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk | CVR: 15413700 | EAN: 5798000399518

Vis desktop version
|WEBSITET ANVENDER COOKIES TIL AT HUSKE DIG OG DINE INDSTILLINGER.| Læs mere her