FreeTextSearch
 
View English language version of this page
 
 
 

Effect of sampling on measurement errors

Reference Olsen E. Effect of sampling on measurement errors. Analyst 1996;121(9):1155-61.
Udgivet: 1996
Type: Videnskabelig artikel
Resumé: Often the analyst is taken as a guarantor for data quality in spite of the fact that sampling is commonly performed by others. If the analyst ignores sampling uncertainties, the money spent on quality control of analysis may sometimes be in vain. The analyst ought to be aware of the difference between controlling exposure and measuring workers' exposure at the workplace. When controlling exposure the aim is to ensure that workers' exposures are below the given occupational exposure limits (OELs); when measuring exposure the aim is to determine what the worker is actually exposed to, on average. In the working environment, exposure is usually controlled by measuring worst case situations, i.e., situations where exposure is higher than average by an unknown amount. As pointed out by Eisenhart (cf. Anal. Chem., 1981, 53, 1588A), measuring without a state of statistical control being attained cannot in any logical sense be regarded as measuring anything at all. Except for substances for which the OELs are ceiling limits that must not be exceeded, worst case results cannot be used for documenting non-compliance or for risk assessment, epidemiology or standard setting. Measuring workers' exposure requires estimation of the time weighted average concentration in the exposure period considered (TWACExposure Period) by carrying out measurements, preferably over a series of days (TWACDay). Kromhout et al., (Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1993, 37, 253) found TWACDay data to be lognormally distributed with a median geometric standard deviation of 2.5. Sampling from such distributions is shown to give very disperse results. Consequently, many measurement days are needed. A TWACExposure Period estimate, therefore, is either very uncertain or has been very costly to obtain. In order to obtain more reliable results at an affordable cost, an alternative approach, called the logbook method, has recently been suggested for the estimation of TWACExposure Period. Commonly, workers considered to be
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/AN9962101155
Bestilling: Denne udgivelse kan ikke bestilles fra NFA's Forlag
 
Opdateret  01.01.1996
Kontakt: NFA's webredaktion
 
Om betalingstidsskrifter
Mange videnskabelige tidsskrifter tager betaling for adgang til hele artiklen. Hvis du ikke har adgang til et bestemt tidsskrift, kan du benytte Bibliotek.dk. Her kan du søge efter artikler, bogtitler og tidsskrifter på tværs af de danske bibliotekssystemer.

Det letteste er at gå ind under "Flere søgemuligheder" på siden og så indtaste tidsskriftets navn i Feltet "Titel". Derved får du en oversigt over folke- eller forskningsbiblioteker, som abonnerer på det pågældende tidsskrift.

 
 
 

Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø | Lersø Parkallé 105 | DK-2100 København Ø |

Tlf 39 16 52 00 | fax 39 16 52 01 | e-mail: nfa@arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk | CVR: 15413700 | EAN: 5798000399518